Here are three points with supporting FACTS you should check yourself about 9/11 that don't add up to the "official" report of events:
1] Jet Fuel Fires Weakened the Structure
Misconception: "It was the fire that killed the buildings. There's nothing on earth that could survive those temperatures with that amount of fuel burning." The columns would have melted, the floors would have melted and eventually they would have collapsed one on top of each other."
FACT: Melting point of structural steel - Approx. 2700°F
FACT: Maximum burning temperature of jet fuel - Approx. 1500°F
FACT: No steel structure has ever collapsed from fire (Search Windsor Building, Madrid, Feb 2005)
The fires didn't burn long enough to melt the steel to the point of collapse. The majority of jet fuel from the crash of the second plane ignited into that HUGE fireball we all saw on the OUTSIDE of the building. YET that tower collapsed first, even though the fire had burned for a SHORTER period of time.
2] Pancake Theory of Twin Towers ( Floors fell on top of each other one by one )
Misconception: One floor fails and falls onto the floor below, causing it to fail and fall on the floor below that one, and so forth. The "pancake theory" implies that this continues all the way to the ground floor.
FACT: Gravity = 32.2 ft/sec2 or 9.81 m/sec2
FACT: North Tower 1368 feet
FACT: brick dropped from 1368 feet hits the ground in 9.22 seconds (in a vacuum, longer with air resistance)
FACT: Collapse of Tower 1 - 10sec
FACT: Collapse of Tower 2 - 8sec
Assume that the top floor stays intact as a solid block weight, Block-A. Start the collapse timer when the 109th floor fails. At that instant, assume floor 108 miraculously turns to dust and disappears. So, Block-A can drop at free-fall speed until it reaches the 108th floor. After Block-A travels one floor, it now has momentum. If all of the momentum is transferred from Block-A to Block-B, the next floor, Block-A will stop moving momentarily, even if there is no resistance for the next block to start moving. If Block-A stops moving, after triggering the next sequence, the mass of Block-A will not arrive in time to transfer momentum to the next "pancaking" between Block-B and Block-C. In other words, the momentum will not be increased as the "collapse" progresses. - (http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html)
So you drop a brick from 1368 ft in a vacuum, and it hits the ground in 9.2 seconds. But 100 floors fall on top of each other and they hit the ground in 9 second as well? Sure if explosives pulverize the floors and supports beneath to create a vacuum and free fall.
3] WTC Building 7 Collapse (Perhaps the key to it all)
Misconception: WTC Building 7 Collapsed from Fire Damage
FACT: WTC 7 was not hit by a plane
FACT: Fire damage was nowhere near as severe as Twin Towers
FACT: Larry Silverstein is the New York property tycoon who purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. Silversten, who made a down payment of $124 million on this $3.2 billion complex, promptly insured it for $7 Billion. He also covered the complex against "terrorist attacks".
FACT:It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell.
FACT: Projected cost to disassemble the towers: $15 Billion
FACT: WTC 7 housed thousands of sensitive files relating to some of the biggest financial scams in history including Enron and WorldCom. Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy ($7B), based on the two—in Silverstein' s view—separate attacks. The insurance company, Swiss Re, paid Mr. Silverstein $4.6 Billion.
FACT: Building 7 owner Larry Silverstein admits to controlled demolition of WTC 7 in 2002 PBS Documentary, AMERICA REBUILDS
"I remember getting a call from the...er...fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." - Larry silverstein
Video excerpt from AMERICA REBUILDS:
If WTC was brought down by controlled demolition, then isn't it plausible that the North and South Towers were brought down ultimately by explosives? Firefighters, police, reporters, and others present heard and saw explosions.
There are many things that don't add up. The 9/11 Commission Report is a horrible waste of money and time that omitted and overlooked so many obvious points. Do your own research, look into the 3 areas I pointed out above to start.
VIDEO TO WATCH: LOOSE CHANGE
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=Loose+change&hl=en
BOOK TO READ:
The New Pearl Harbor—Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
by David Ray Griffin:
(Video below - David Ray Griffin lecture outlining points from his book)
WEB LINKS:
http://www.prisonplanet.com
http://www.infowars.com
http://www.911pressfortruth.com
http://www.911truth.org
Monday, September 11, 2006
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
STOP TRYING TO SCARE US
BUSH REMINDS AMERICANS U.S. IS AT WAR
'WASHINGTON - President Bush used terrorists' own words Tuesday to battle complacency among Americans about the threat of future attack, defending his record as the fall campaign season kicks into high gear.' – MERRILL HARTSON, Associated Press Writer
-------
OK...hold up....if history repeats itself which it usually does, we can expect to see over the next year, several more "threats" or possible incidents either facilitated by or secretly supported by the administration. I think at this point it's clear that the amount of profit and the amount of people that stand to gain financially from the US being at war is far too great for us not invade, say Iran, or create another situation in which we need to "defend" or invade or KILL more people.
It's certainly debateable that the country is safer now than it was when Bush took office. 9/11 changed everything. It allowed the government to tighten the rope on our liberties, and in my opinion, they keep looking for ways to pull even tighter. The amount of surveillance, checkpoints, security, and violations of civil rights, are increasing with the constant threats and terrorist plots.
I'm actually surprised that we don't have the same amount of surveillance as London. They have a cluster of four or five cameras at every corner. You can move through the streets without being tracked by cameras with powerful face recognition software.
The threat of another attack, or attack itself means that the steps toward a inforcing "Police State" will move forward. During the Republican National Convention, there were more Police and Armed Guard personnel than ever before for such an event. Now granted the beefed up security is to be ready in the event of some terrorist acitivity, right? But it also fits in with the plan of Police State. We lose control, and are told what to do, when to do it, and must comply or we will be arrested. Demonstrators, most of then peaceful, were arrested and locked in an unsafe abandoned warhouse, containing asbestos. Their rights were taken away, and they were treated like prisoners of war.
Just be aware, when we hear news stories about folied terrorist attempts, or close calls, we only know what's being reported, we don't know what's being embellished and what actually happened. War, oil, troops, deployment, weapons, ammunition...It's BIG MONEY...and many people are putting there kids and grand kids through college on that money. You think that's gonna just go away?
If we get attacked, we get attacked. Hopefully that can be prevented. But "warnings" from the Bush administration, only make me think that it's the beginning of getting the american people ready for the next step in losing more freedom. Bush says "the terrorists hate us for our freedom", well we certainly are not gaining anymore freedom, thanks to the current administration. We couldn't even take bottled water on a plane for crying out loud.
I can't help but think of that one expression from George Bush that says it all. It's when he sat there at the Emma T. Booker Elementary School on September 11. When Andrew Card tells the President that the second plane has hit the south tower, the President produced the all too well known guilty look on his face. What I saw specifically in the video, was right after Card whispers the news, the president contorts his mouth and bites the inside, which is typical of either being very confused, or guilty. We have all done that. It's like when the kid put the whoopie cushion under the teacher's chair. When the teacher demands to know who did it, the guilty kid sits in silence, trying to hide any emotion from the teacher as well as the class—and the lips always move—either they pucker slightly, or tighten. That's the behavior and expression I saw from the president. I guess he felt extremely safe at an elementary school, the location of which was public knowledge. Otherwise don't you think he would have left?
'WASHINGTON - President Bush used terrorists' own words Tuesday to battle complacency among Americans about the threat of future attack, defending his record as the fall campaign season kicks into high gear.' – MERRILL HARTSON, Associated Press Writer
-------
OK...hold up....if history repeats itself which it usually does, we can expect to see over the next year, several more "threats" or possible incidents either facilitated by or secretly supported by the administration. I think at this point it's clear that the amount of profit and the amount of people that stand to gain financially from the US being at war is far too great for us not invade, say Iran, or create another situation in which we need to "defend" or invade or KILL more people.
It's certainly debateable that the country is safer now than it was when Bush took office. 9/11 changed everything. It allowed the government to tighten the rope on our liberties, and in my opinion, they keep looking for ways to pull even tighter. The amount of surveillance, checkpoints, security, and violations of civil rights, are increasing with the constant threats and terrorist plots.
I'm actually surprised that we don't have the same amount of surveillance as London. They have a cluster of four or five cameras at every corner. You can move through the streets without being tracked by cameras with powerful face recognition software.
The threat of another attack, or attack itself means that the steps toward a inforcing "Police State" will move forward. During the Republican National Convention, there were more Police and Armed Guard personnel than ever before for such an event. Now granted the beefed up security is to be ready in the event of some terrorist acitivity, right? But it also fits in with the plan of Police State. We lose control, and are told what to do, when to do it, and must comply or we will be arrested. Demonstrators, most of then peaceful, were arrested and locked in an unsafe abandoned warhouse, containing asbestos. Their rights were taken away, and they were treated like prisoners of war.
Just be aware, when we hear news stories about folied terrorist attempts, or close calls, we only know what's being reported, we don't know what's being embellished and what actually happened. War, oil, troops, deployment, weapons, ammunition...It's BIG MONEY...and many people are putting there kids and grand kids through college on that money. You think that's gonna just go away?
If we get attacked, we get attacked. Hopefully that can be prevented. But "warnings" from the Bush administration, only make me think that it's the beginning of getting the american people ready for the next step in losing more freedom. Bush says "the terrorists hate us for our freedom", well we certainly are not gaining anymore freedom, thanks to the current administration. We couldn't even take bottled water on a plane for crying out loud.
I can't help but think of that one expression from George Bush that says it all. It's when he sat there at the Emma T. Booker Elementary School on September 11. When Andrew Card tells the President that the second plane has hit the south tower, the President produced the all too well known guilty look on his face. What I saw specifically in the video, was right after Card whispers the news, the president contorts his mouth and bites the inside, which is typical of either being very confused, or guilty. We have all done that. It's like when the kid put the whoopie cushion under the teacher's chair. When the teacher demands to know who did it, the guilty kid sits in silence, trying to hide any emotion from the teacher as well as the class—and the lips always move—either they pucker slightly, or tighten. That's the behavior and expression I saw from the president. I guess he felt extremely safe at an elementary school, the location of which was public knowledge. Otherwise don't you think he would have left?
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Friday, September 01, 2006
AOL Customer Service: JUST LISTEN!
I'm sure many of you have either heard about or seen the clip where Vincent Ferrari calls AOL customer service to cancel his account. Who knew it would be THAT difficult? I mean, it's ridiculous. This jerk just can't let it go and cancel the account. Well, his persistance got him fired... For those who didn't see the clip, please check this out it's unbelievable...
A lot of people still use AOL. I still have MY account, because I always heard it was too much of a hassle to cancel. Maybe now they'll just shut up and listen.
A lot of people still use AOL. I still have MY account, because I always heard it was too much of a hassle to cancel. Maybe now they'll just shut up and listen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
